Subject: Re: 100baseT ethernet card questions
To: Jason Thorpe <email@example.com>
From: Scott Bartram <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 12/07/1998 18:39:28
On Mon, 7 Dec 1998, Jason Thorpe wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Dec 1998 16:13:21 -0500 (EST)
> Scott Bartram <email@example.com> wrote:
> > Two weeks after purchasing a NetGear FA-310TX card with a Digital chip, I
> > ordered another and it came with the "new" Lite-On PNIC chip. Is anyone
> > working on code to support this chip? I can test/debug.
> I don't know the status of this one, but...
I thought I remember someone (maybe Charles?) saying they had some
preliminary diffs. I'll check the archives.
> > I've also got a generic card with an RTL-8139 chip. According to the Linux
> > driver docs, this chip is completely different than the 80x9. Anyone
> > working on that one?
> I have a driver, and a card, but I'm having problems with it... it transmits
> the first frame correctly, and then never transmits another one. I'm still
> hunting this one down.
OK. Let me know if you need another tester.
> > To make matters even more frustrating, I've got an SMC EtherPower II that
> > suffers from the "epic0: timeout" problem.
> ...this one, too. I suspect it is problems with the EPIC hardware itself.
> The FreeBSD people have reported similar problems with their (completely
> different) driver.
The Linux driver page lists all kinds of hardware problems they try to
work around. I wish I had seen it before I spent money on the card ;-)
So, knowing all this now, what is considered the most solid 100Mb chipset
supported by NetBSD?