Subject: Re: named broken?
To: I presume I need no introduction. <greywolf@starwolf.starwolf.com>
From: Perry E. Metzger <perry@piermont.com>
List: current-users
Date: 11/28/1998 17:11:01
I presume I need no introduction. writes:
> Okay, this is odd.  I rebuilt my name server over the LAST weekend,
> installed it THIS weekend, and it suddenly broke, causing all my mail
> to bounce for two days.  This is also the fault of the mail config,
> but that's another story entirely.  I restored the old named from tape,
> fixed sendmail.cf (brute force method) and it worked again.
> 
> It reported being named version 8.something, I think.  It was very odd.

When running current-, you have to pay attention to current-users.

Before, we used bind v4. We started using bind v8, which is much
better, but uses a different config file. There were BIG WARNINGS
about this on current-users, but you apparently didn't read them.

There is a script to convert config file forats, btw.

.pm