In message <199811240038.TAA02090@grosse.fugue.com>, Ted Lemon writes:
>An important point to bear in mind is that we don't want this to be
>complex.  Implementing PAM on top of the BSD/os model would be even
>more complex than just using the BSD/os model.   This means that there
>would be more opportunities to make an embarrassing and compromising
>mistake.   So I think we should pick PAM, or BSD/os, or neither.   We
>should not pick both.

While I agree that we should pick one as the one we use (and it needn't
be either of PAM or BSD/OS), I think that either way, there may be some
value to writing the crossover module.  login_pam would be a pretty trivial
program, I'd expect.

-s