Subject: Re: "BSD Authentication"
To: None <seebs@plethora.net>
From: David Holland <dholland@cs.toronto.edu>
List: current-users
Date: 11/23/1998 14:34:32
> One of the advantages of BSD Auth is that a non-setuid program can
> do authentication checks that require setuid, because the
> authentication program can be setuid. I don't think PAM can do
> this. This might be a plus for, e.g., screen savers.
Screen savers shouldn't be doing authentication checks. Remember
lock(1)? It would ask you for a passphrase before locking. xlock
should be exactly the same way.
--
- David A. Holland | (please continue to send non-list mail to
dholland@cs.utoronto.ca | dholland@hcs.harvard.edu. yes, I moved.)