Subject: Re: RAIDframe, anyone?
To: Luke Mewburn <lukem@cs.rmit.edu.au>
From: Andrew Gillham <gillhaa@ghost.whirlpool.com>
List: current-users
Date: 11/22/1998 17:30:12
Luke Mewburn writes:
>
> I'd be very surprised if you got more than 1.3 - 1.5MB/s through an
> AHA1542B (or any other ISA SCSI controller), no matter how fast the
> drive is (that's been my experience anyway). So it appears that your
> reads are limited by the controller I/O not by RAIDframe.
Using a simple dd I get:
dd if=/dev/sd1e of=/dev/null bs=128k count=256 about 1.3MB/s
dd if=/dev/rsd1e of=/dev/null bs=128k count=256 about 2.2MB/s
> It would be interesting to compare the results against a similar
> machine using EISA or PCI SCSI instead (I have a 486 M/B with a
> PCI SCSI controller).
I have a 486DX2/66 with an EISA 1742 that I can probably get going
to test. I don't have a 486/33 EISA readily available, but I could
test the 1542B in the EISA box.
I would be interested in hearing from anyone that has tested large
EIDE drives (~10GB) with RAIDframe or just ccd.
-Andrew
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Andrew Gillham | This space left blank
gillham@whirlpool.com | inadvertently.
I speak for myself, not for my employer. | Contact the publisher.