On Tue, 27 Oct 1998, Ted Lemon wrote:

> Hm.   That's a bit ugly.   Is there any particular reason why syslogd
> can't start without -s?   I.e., does it fail, and if so, how?   It
> probably shouldn't fail.

Well, at that time there are no network interfaces active. If it
will automatically start to listen on new network interfaces as
they're configured, perhaps we can just start it with the standard
arguments.

cjs
--
Curt Sampson  <cjs@portal.ca>  604-257-9400    De gustibus, aut bene aut nihil.
Any opinions expressed are mine and mine alone.
The most widely ported operating system in the world: http://www.netbsd.org