Subject: Re: spray and fxp0
To: Erik E. Fair <>
From: Charles M. Hannum <>
List: current-users
Date: 10/21/1998 09:42:49
> This error message should be changed for this condition. It is inaccurate,
> and the cause of much confusion. There should be an EQFULL instead, so that
> people don't go looking at "netstat -m" after getting ENOBUFS and then
> scratching their heads when they see that there's plenty of mbuf RAM.

EAGAIN is arguably the right error code for this.