Subject: Re: spray and fxp0
To: Erik E. Fair <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Jason Thorpe <email@example.com>
Date: 10/20/1998 10:27:58
On Mon, 19 Oct 1998 19:26:27 -0700
"Erik E. Fair" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> This error message should be changed for this condition. It is inaccurate,
> and the cause of much confusion. There should be an EQFULL instead, so that
> people don't go looking at "netstat -m" after getting ENOBUFS and then
> scratching their heads when they see that there's plenty of mbuf RAM.
Yah, I don't disagree with you there...
Jason R. Thorpe email@example.com
NASA Ames Research Center Home: +1 408 866 1912
NAS: M/S 258-5 Work: +1 650 604 0935
Moffett Field, CA 94035 Pager: +1 650 940 5942