> that gets run to actually do the work.  This is fairly ugly, and requires
> a lot more maintenence than the original for loop.  psh requires exactly
> as much maintence as the original for loop.  :)

I was thinking more in terms of being able to have a solution that
is portable.  Most of the big machines I use run Solaris which is why
I wrote the C version of parallel - because I had problems with
sigchld on solaris...

--sjg