Subject: Re: Another changer, another changer problem
To: Curt Sampson <email@example.com>
From: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 10/13/1998 12:31:39
In message <Pine.NEB.email@example.com>, Curt Sa
>If you can implement runlevels with another feature, why add run
>levels as well? Aside from wanting to confuse the user?
I wouldn't want to add runlevels to the system-as-shipped, but if we had
groups of things, it would be trivial for people who want runlevels to
make groups with the right properties.
Thus, I consider the "groups of services" to be an improvement on runlevels
by virtue of generality.