Subject: Re: Another changer, another changer problem
To: None <>
From: Christoph Badura <>
List: current-users
Date: 10/02/1998 01:24:10 (Greg A. Woods) writes:

>The former two
>are probably not worthy of use, but the latter still is though I'll
>probably keep it in my AT&T 3B2 where it has full OS support, including
>explict device naming such as "c0t0d0s0" which means "controller 0,
>target 0, disk(LUN) 0, slice 0" (something I wish NetBSD had).

Excuse me?

	sd0 at scsibus0 target 0 lun 0

in the kernel config file works just fine.  Noone is preventing you from
changing to /dev and doing "ln sd0a c0t0d0s0" either.

Christoph Badura
Verlag O'Reilly