In article <199809171724.NAA29924@jekyll.piermont.com> perry@piermont.com writes:
>
>Dave Huang writes:
>> On Thu, 17 Sep 1998, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
>> > The intent is to put the CODA stuff in a separate set, so you need not 
>> > install it. However, having *unavailable* as a base set would seem to
>> > me to be a bad idea.
>> 
>> What about the netatalk userland stuff? I haven't looked real hard for it
>> lately, but last I checked, there weren't any precompiled binary
>> distributions; I had to compile it myself. The netatalk kernel support
>> isn't even particularly new; I think it was in 1.3.
>
>I also believe netatalk userland should be in the tree.

Bill was supposed to work on that, but if he does not want to anymore I'll
put it on my list.

christos