Subject: Re: AFS/arla
To: None <>
From: Christos Zoulas <>
List: current-users
Date: 09/18/1998 07:45:31
In article <> writes:
>Dave Huang writes:
>> On Thu, 17 Sep 1998, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
>> > The intent is to put the CODA stuff in a separate set, so you need not 
>> > install it. However, having *unavailable* as a base set would seem to
>> > me to be a bad idea.
>> What about the netatalk userland stuff? I haven't looked real hard for it
>> lately, but last I checked, there weren't any precompiled binary
>> distributions; I had to compile it myself. The netatalk kernel support
>> isn't even particularly new; I think it was in 1.3.
>I also believe netatalk userland should be in the tree.

Bill was supposed to work on that, but if he does not want to anymore I'll
put it on my list.