Subject: Re: Sleepycat Software DB 2.x library licensing vs. NetBSD To: NetBSD-current Discussion List <firstname.lastname@example.org> From: Greg Hudson <email@example.com> List: current-users Date: 09/17/1998 15:45:56
db lives in libc. The Sleepycat license is, unless I'm really
confused about it, totally unacceptable for the NetBSD libc given the
priorities of the project. There's a difference between shipping
GPL'd programs and shipping an infected library.