Subject: Re: Sleepycat Software DB 2.x library licensing vs. NetBSD
To: NetBSD-current Discussion List <current-users@netbsd.org>
From: Greg Hudson <ghudson@mit.edu>
List: current-users
Date: 09/17/1998 15:45:56 
db lives in libc.  The Sleepycat license is, unless I'm really
confused about it, totally unacceptable for the NetBSD libc given the
priorities of the project.  There's a difference between shipping
GPL'd programs and shipping an infected library.