Dave Huang writes:
> On Thu, 17 Sep 1998, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> > The intent is to put the CODA stuff in a separate set, so you need not 
> > install it. However, having *unavailable* as a base set would seem to
> > me to be a bad idea.
> 
> What about the netatalk userland stuff? I haven't looked real hard for it
> lately, but last I checked, there weren't any precompiled binary
> distributions; I had to compile it myself. The netatalk kernel support
> isn't even particularly new; I think it was in 1.3.

I also believe netatalk userland should be in the tree.

.pm