"Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com> writes:


>seebs@plethora.net writes:

>> What surprises me is that, if I don't do a 'make depend', those files
>> don't seem to get built.  That's confusing, IMHO.

>That is a bug, but OTOH, if your dependencies are wrong, nothing is
>guaranteed to work right.


If you just created a virgin source tree, filled it with fresh source,
then plain old "make" should build everything without needing a
"make depend".  Is that the case Peter's talking about?