>> printf("%s: %dMB, %d cyl, %d head, %d sec, %d bytes/sect x %d sectors", ...)
>> printf("%s: %dMB, %d sec, geom chs %d/%d/%d, %d bytes/sec\n", ...)
>> I can't see any reason to not have the same format for scsi and ata
>> drives.
> Right, both ata and scsi drives should report this info and the
> printout should be the same!  I've always thought the scsi version
> was a bit verbose.  Lets see what the comunity thinks and then adjust
> them both.

If this is a vote, I vote for the SCSI version.  If you want something
more abbreviated, I'd go for

%s: %dMB, %dx%dx%d, %dx%d

(with the (conceptual) arglist: name, (sect_count*sect_size)/1048576,
cyl_count, tracks_per_cyl, sects_per_track, sect_count, sect_size).

But that is sufficiently abbreviated that it could be *too* brief.

					der Mouse

			       mouse@rodents.montreal.qc.ca
		     7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B