Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.lip6.fr> writes:

> Would'nt something like
> printf("%s: %dMB, %d cyl, %d head, %d sec, %d bytes/sect x %d sectors", ...)
> look better than the actual
> printf("%s: %dMB, %d sec, geom chs %d/%d/%d, %d bytes/sec\n", ...)
> 
> I can't see any reason to not have the same format for scsi and ata drives.
Right, both ata and scsi drives should report this info and the
printout should be the same!  I've always thought the scsi version was
a bit verbose.  Lets see what the comunity thinks and then adjust them
both.