Subject: Re: scsi-disks hardsectored to 1024 byte/sec
To: Erik E. Fair <fair@clock.org>
From: Leo Weppelman <leo@wau.mis.ah.nl>
List: current-users
Date: 07/16/1998 13:47:56
On Wed 15 Jul 1998, Erik E. Fair wrote:
> Leo,
> Do you have the time to forward your patches to
> gnats-bugs@gnats.netbsd.org with the subject set to match the PR, so that
> GNATS will automatically record them?
I already did that (just before I jumped into the thread ;-). I just checked
gnats and it is there (retrieve pr 3792).
> It would also be nice to get a summary of your performance data...
I'll look for it. Here at work, in my clipboard was the following piece of
Bonnie data (Note that this was on a 300Mb old MAXTOR, I had one on 1024 and
one on 512 byte sector size in my system at that time):
-------Sequential Output-------- ---Sequential Input-- --Random--
-Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block--- --Seeks---
Machine MB K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU /sec %CPU
100-1K 100 384 60.0 380 11.6 290 13.6 509 99.3 994 23.7 30.0 9.0
100-512 100 583 99.0 1110 63.3 559 47.3 508 99.3 1005 46.6 31.5 8.8
100-512O 100 583 99.1 1114 64.4 558 50.1 508 99.4 1005 46.6 31.6 8.9
Legenda:
100-1K : Use patched kernel on a 1K sectored disk
100-512 : Use patched kernel on a 512B sectored disk
100-512O: 512B sectored disk, kernel not patched
Leo.