Subject: Re: README: changes to libbfd for m68k people
To: Todd Vierling <tv@pobox.com>
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@nas.nasa.gov>
List: current-users
Date: 07/12/1998 12:26:52
On Sun, 12 Jul 1998 15:29:15 -0400 (EDT) 
 Todd Vierling <tv@pobox.com> wrote:

 > Yes, we should, and bump the major of libbfd after doing so.  If you wish,
 > I'll add the available ELF targets elsewhere that it would be useful, and
 > then bump the major.

No, I don't think this is appropriate for a major bump.  It's not really
an interface _per se_ that's changing...

We could "fix" the problem by doing something like:

struct foo foo_vec_store[] = {
	...
};

/* foo_vec is what external things reference */
struct foo *foo_vec = foo_vec_store;

...and then linking _one more time_ :-)  This would cause the size of
the symbol to be forever more sizeof(struct foo_vec *), no matter how
many items add.

Jason R. Thorpe                                       thorpej@nas.nasa.gov
NASA Ames Research Center                            Home: +1 408 866 1912
NAS: M/S 258-5                                       Work: +1 650 604 0935
Moffett Field, CA 94035                             Pager: +1 650 940 5942