Subject: Re: NATM broken: atm needs-flag vs options NATM
To: None <current-users@NetBSD.ORG>
From: Greg A. Woods <woods@most.weird.com>
List: current-users
Date: 07/06/1998 23:14:27
[ On Mon, July 6, 1998 at 13:54:20 (-0400), der Mouse wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: NATM broken: atm needs-flag vs options NATM
>
> Actually, it occurs to me that reserving N_* *is* reasonable, and is
> only a small change from current practice.

That was going to be my reply to your earlier message regarding my
inadvisable suggestion of reserving all of the N* namespace.   ;-)

-- 
							Greg A. Woods

+1 416 443-1734      VE3TCP      <gwoods@acm.org>      <robohack!woods>
Planix, Inc. <woods@planix.com>; Secrets of the Weird <woods@weird.com>