Subject: Re: NATM broken: atm needs-flag vs options NATM
To: None <current-users@NetBSD.ORG>
From: Guenther Grau <Guenther.Grau@bk.bosch.de>
Date: 07/06/1998 19:47:17
Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
> why not just detect NFOO vs FOO conflicts when running config..
> i.e., if there's a defopt NFOO and a `foo needs-count' or `foo
> needs-flag', just complain about the conflict..
People still might confuse it in the code. I'd prefer
the _FLAG solution or reserving the name space N*. I
thought NetBSD wanted to DTRT. So why not change things
once and be safe in the future?