Subject: Re: NATM broken: atm needs-flag vs options NATM
To: None <current-users@NetBSD.ORG>
From: Christoph Badura <>
List: current-users
Date: 07/06/1998 00:09:26
jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU (Jonathan Stone) writes:
>Check sys/conf/files: it has dependencies on both atm and natm.  I'm
>suggesting we eliminate the conflict by dropping "needs-flag" on atm,
>since atm.h doens't seem to be used anywhere.  (options NATM would
>then be defopt'ed, as for other network-stack options.)

Perhaps "options NATM" should really be renamed to prevent a name clash

Christoph Badura

Now available in print: Lion's Commentary on UNIX 6th Edition, with Source Code