>> Perhaps "options NATM" should really be renamed to prevent a name
>> clash again.

> I would agree.  Kernel options that begin with 'N' should be in a
> reserved namespace for the exclusive use of config(8).

Looking at a few GENERIC config files in a (rather old) source tree I
happen to have handy, I find four options beginning with N, none of
which strike me as likely to be mistaken for counts a la NATM:
NFSSERVER, NFSCLIENT, NULLFS, NFS_BOOT_RWSIZE.  I think reserving all
options beginning with N is..excessive.

					der Mouse

			       mouse@rodents.montreal.qc.ca
		     7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B