Subject: Re: Lots of defopt'ing - why?
To: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@nas.nasa.gov>
From: Paul Goyette <paul@whooppee.com>
List: current-users
Date: 06/28/1998 17:11:06
I always wondered why we called them "defopts" - sounds an awful lot
like "default options", and it confused me for a while, too. It might
have been nicer to have called them "hdropts" - but of course it's way
too late to change now. :)
On Sun, 28 Jun 1998, Jason Thorpe wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jun 1998 00:32:22 +0200 (MEST)
> Hubert Feyrer <feyrer@rfhs8012.fh-regensburg.de> wrote:
>
> > I'm just catching up source-changes from a couple of days, and I see a lot
> > of former kernel options now being defopt'ed: NFSSERVER, COMPAT_LINUX,
> > COMPAT_FREEBSD, COMPAT_SUNOS, ... What's the idea behind this?
> >
> > Wasn't the intention of these options to remove unnecessary code from the
> > kernel if one didn't need the funcionality? Is it just me who is under the
> > impression that this optionality is gone now - or am I just missing
> > something obvious?
>
> They're still options... but headers are now generated for them so that
> proper dependencies can be generated on them.
>
> Jason R. Thorpe thorpej@nas.nasa.gov
> NASA Ames Research Center Home: +1 408 866 1912
> NAS: M/S 258-5 Work: +1 650 604 0935
> Moffett Field, CA 94035 Pager: +1 650 428 6939
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Paul Goyette | Public Key fingerprint: | E-mail addresses: |
| Network Engineer | 0E 40 D2 FC 2A 13 74 A0 | paul@whooppee.com |
| and kernel hacker | E4 69 D5 BE 65 E4 56 C6 | paul.goyette@ascend.com |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------