> And of course qmail, http://www.qmail.org/ which also has few
> security holes.

Few *generally known* security holes.

One reason sendmail is viewed as such a mess of security holes is that
it has over half the net using it, so it's got everyone and hir dog in
the cracker community scrutinizing it for holes.  I don't for a moment
doubt that if exim or qmail or zmailer or any of the others were to be
used comparably widely, holes would quickly be found.

					der Mouse

			       mouse@rodents.montreal.qc.ca
		     7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B