Subject: Re: Sendmail 8.9.0
To: None <current-users@NetBSD.ORG>
From: der Mouse <mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA>
Date: 06/07/1998 06:56:41
> And of course qmail, http://www.qmail.org/ which also has few
> security holes.
Few *generally known* security holes.
One reason sendmail is viewed as such a mess of security holes is that
it has over half the net using it, so it's got everyone and hir dog in
the cracker community scrutinizing it for holes. I don't for a moment
doubt that if exim or qmail or zmailer or any of the others were to be
used comparably widely, holes would quickly be found.
7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B