Subject: Re: nmh versus emacs mh-e?
To: Jonathan Stone <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU>
From: Dave Sainty <dave@dtsp.co.nz>
List: current-users
Date: 05/14/1998 12:41:18
Jonathan Stone writes:
> This might be more a pkg thing, but has anyone gotten
> the NetBSD nmh package to work with mh-e?
>
> The NetBSD integration moves mhl and inc and the nmh config files
> around. Even native nmh doens't quite match how mh-e uses mh,
> but with the NetBSD integrated nmh, the recommended workaround
> doesn't work, at least for me. Has anyone gotten it to work?
It "basically" works for me. Did you use the Emacs package too?
Emacs package patch-ag fixes the elisp, and I add to my .emacs:
;; NetBSD package mh library location (cannot be found by normal packages)
(if (file-executable-p "/usr/pkg/libexec/nmh/mhl")
(setq mh-lib "/usr/pkg/libexec/nmh"))
However, I only use emacs for composing email and use exmh for
everything else, so may miss the problems you are having. This is
with nmh-0.23 and emacs-20.2. The creation time on patch-ag is April
14.
Cheers,
Dave.