Subject: Re: HTML documentation and such
To: None <current-users@NetBSD.ORG>
From: Jaromir Dolecek <dolecek@ics.muni.cz>
List: current-users
Date: 05/06/1998 21:59:54
Ty Sarna wrote:
> In article <199805060708.JAA03697@rumolt.teuto.de>,
> Martin Husemann  <martin@rumolt.teuto.de> wrote:
> > >Fix:
> > 
> > Include the html subdirectory of the original distribution?
> 
> Would it bee a good idea to have a /usr/share/doc/html for this
> kind of thing? I excpect more and more programs to shart shipping docs
> in HTML form and some of these either are or will be included in the
> tree at some point. 
> 
> Hmm, looking at my /usr/pkg, I have a share/doc/HTML tree from KDE.
> there are subdirs for each language (en, de, ...) and a default symlink
> to en. For lack of a better precedent, how about
> /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/xnrpd/...? 
> 

Sounds goot (though I like .../html/ more that uppercase ;).

Other thing I was thinking about -- it would be nice to have available
all the {info|html} documentation for such things like gcc.
IMHO ideal would be some documentation-only package, such as gcc-doc
or something like this.  Man surely won't need this on every system
around ...

-- 
Jaromir Dolecek <dolecek@ics.muni.cz>	http://www.ics.muni.cz/~dolecek/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is better never to have been born.  But who among us has such luck?
One in a million, perhaps.