Subject: Re: Intel EtherExpress Pro/100 ISA NIC: which kernel driver to use?
To: Ruibiao Qiu <email@example.com>
From: John C. Hayward <John.C.Hayward@wheaton.edu>
Date: 04/16/1998 23:22:17
I have an Intell EtherExpress Pro/100 ISA.
My experience with 1.3 NetBSD i386 was that I could probe the card if I
in dos configured it to a particular irq and io memory place as a iy
device and configured the kernel to the correct irq and io. (not
PnP). The configuration file I pulled off of the web from the intel
In the probing the kernel complained about some invalid IRQ but
it seemed to ignore it in that I could tell it to change media
(via Link1,2 - note current has this changed to use media names)
I could not however see packets going out on the network. I turned on
the IYDEBUG flag and noticed that packets seemed to get to the point
they seemed to be going out but the interupt associated with the
transmission completed never seemed to be seen.
The card works as advertized in Win-95.
I upgraded from 1.2G because there was support for this card
in 1.3 so it may be the case of a new driver. In looking at
the current code it did not seem significantly changed except
for the media options.
In a previous note no one seemed to have ideas why I was having problems.
On Thu, 16 Apr 1998, Ruibiao Qiu wrote:
> I have an Intel EtherExpress Pro/100 ISA NIC. When building
> kernel, I found that there are ix0 and iy0 options. The first one
> is for EtherExpress/16 and the second one is for Ether Express Pro
> 10 ISA. I enabled both when config'd my kernel. When booting up,
> the NIC was not detected at all, neither as ix0 nor as iy0.
> BTW, in the current GENERIC config file, ix0 uses port 0x300 irq
> 10, and iy0 uses 0x360 irq '?'. Are these strict for Intel NIC?
> Can I set them to something like:
> ix0 at isa? port ? irq ?
> iy0 at isa? port ? irq ?
> Also, can this NIC be recognized by PnP? Can I put it in ISA pnp
> section? Currently, PnP section only has 3C579 and NE2000