Subject: Re: Installer proposal...
To: None <current-users@NetBSD.ORG>
From: Greg A. Woods <email@example.com>
Date: 04/15/1998 02:05:25
[ On Tue, April 14, 1998 at 07:47:09 (-0400), der Mouse wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: Installer proposal...
> [%] As I understand the RJ names, RJ45 refers to an eight-conductor
> jack wired up for telephony in a particular way. 10baseT and
> 100baseTX are not telephonic at all, so they aren't RJ45 - they
> just use a physically compatible jack.
Not to mention also that RJ45 is supposed to be 10 conductor! ;-)
(and yes they do exist, and are used, eg. Boca's BB2016 uses them)
Greg A. Woods
+1 416 443-1734 VE3TCP <firstname.lastname@example.org> <robohack!woods>
Planix, Inc. <email@example.com>; Secrets of the Weird <firstname.lastname@example.org>