Subject: Re: Installer proposal...
To: None <current-users@NetBSD.ORG>
From: Greg A. Woods <woods@most.weird.com>
List: current-users
Date: 04/15/1998 02:05:25
[ On Tue, April 14, 1998 at 07:47:09 (-0400), der Mouse wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: Installer proposal...
>
> [%] As I understand the RJ names, RJ45 refers to an eight-conductor
>     jack wired up for telephony in a particular way.  10baseT and
>     100baseTX are not telephonic at all, so they aren't RJ45 - they
>     just use a physically compatible jack.

Not to mention also that RJ45 is supposed to be 10 conductor!  ;-)

(and yes they do exist, and are used, eg. Boca's BB2016 uses them)

-- 
							Greg A. Woods

+1 416 443-1734      VE3TCP      <gwoods@acm.org>      <robohack!woods>
Planix, Inc. <woods@planix.com>; Secrets of the Weird <woods@weird.com>