Subject: Re: archive.c/arm32
To: John F. Woods <email@example.com>
From: Chris G. Demetriou <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 03/23/1998 14:33:24
> > ((int)val & 0x100) == 0
> > (if 'val' is signed and negative, it'll be sign-extended, so bits
> > above the low 8 will be set. otherwise those bits will be zero.)
> If we were willing to require ANSI C,
> (signed char)val >= 0
No it wouldn't, because that would _force_ all chars to be signed,
even if the implementation's chars are by default unsigned.
The whole reason that arm32 gets that warning and ~no other ports do
is that the arm32 is an unsigned-char system.