matthew green <mrg@eterna.com.au> wrote:
> note that the issue of merging the VM and buffer cache has not been
> addressed in UVM.    the plan is to defer that issue until after the
> UVM has settled.

Will that merging then give us a dynamically sized buffer cache?
Or is this something different?


 - Hubert

-- 
Hubert Feyrer <hubert.feyrer@rz.uni-regensburg.de>