Subject: Re: new virtual memory system available: UVM
To: None <current-users@NetBSD.ORG>
From: Hubert Feyrer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 02/07/1998 02:58:21
matthew green <email@example.com> wrote:
> note that the issue of merging the VM and buffer cache has not been
> addressed in UVM. the plan is to defer that issue until after the
> UVM has settled.
Will that merging then give us a dynamically sized buffer cache?
Or is this something different?
Hubert Feyrer <firstname.lastname@example.org>