Subject: Re: semctl() change last arg to '...'?
To: None <current-users@NetBSD.ORG>
From: Christoph Badura <email@example.com>
Date: 11/09/1997 18:52:58
firstname.lastname@example.org (Todd Vierling) writes:
>I'm currently attempting to port Listproc 6.0c to NetBSD 1.3(alpha), and in
>order to make the system interactive, it calls semaphore functions including
>semctl(). However, it calls semctl() with 4 args in some cases, and 3 args
The calls with only three args are bogus. semctl() always takes 4 args.
Although you used get away with sloppy code like this. Though not, if you
>Was semctl() orginally designed with variable arguments (that is, the last
>arg was optional when there was no argument to pass)? If so, would there be
>harm in changing our definition to semctl(int, int, int, ...), making the
>last arg automatically NULL when omitted?
No. semctl() is NOT a variadic function. And declaring it as such does NOT
make the last arg automatically NULL when omitted.
Now available in print: Lion's Commentary on UNIX 6th Edition, with Source Code