Subject: Re: Release cycles
To: Rick Kelly <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: David Maxwell <email@example.com>
Date: 11/05/1997 15:52:10
> Heiko W.Rupp said:
> >Greg A. Woods wrote:
> >|Unfortunately no NetBSD formal release has been truely stable, even, or
> >|especially, on the i386, since 0.9.
Just checking attributions here, did Greg say that? Doesn't sound like
something he'd say... And snert isn't one of his machines (that I know of)
so he's not one > level back...
> >snert!265> uptime
> > 4:41PM up 200 days, 6:56, 4 users, load averages: 1.02, 0.43, 0.28
> >snert!266> uname -a
> >NetBSD snert.pilhuhn.de 1.1 NetBSD 1.1 (SNERT+PPP) #11: Thu Jan 30 11:00:49 MET
NetBSD is darn stable in -current most of the time. I don't think I've ever
had a problem with a release version that didn't turn out to be my fault
Any examples to be had here?