Subject: Re: tcpdump sheds some light on ipnat problem
To: None <current-users@NetBSD.ORG>
From: Christoph Badura <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 10/04/1997 22:36:25
email@example.com (Mason Loring Bliss) writes:
>I just ran tcpdump while attempting to open an ftp connection, and the
>results confirmed that ipnat simply isn't doing any address mapping.
>Outbound packets from my Mac, which *ought* to be mapped to the current IP
>address, instead start off like so:
That seems correct behaviour to me. You said you told IPNAT to
map 10.0.0.0/24 and 10.0.2.0 isn't covered by that mapping. You probably
want to map 10.0/8 or 10.0/16.
BTW, it would be nice if you could try sending follow-up to the same
list as the original article.
Now available in print: Lion's Commentary on UNIX 6th Edition, with Source Code