Subject: Re: tcpdump sheds some light on ipnat problem
To: None <current-users@NetBSD.ORG>
From: Christoph Badura <bad@ora.de>
List: current-users
Date: 10/04/1997 22:36:25
mason@acheron.middleboro.ma.us (Mason Loring Bliss) writes:

>I just ran tcpdump while attempting to open an ftp connection, and the
>results confirmed that ipnat simply isn't doing any address mapping.
>Outbound packets from my Mac, which *ought* to be mapped to the current IP
>address, instead start off like so:

>10.0.2.15.32768 >

That seems correct behaviour to me.  You said you told IPNAT to
map 10.0.0.0/24 and 10.0.2.0 isn't covered by that mapping.  You probably
want to map 10.0/8 or 10.0/16.

BTW, it would be nice if you could try sending follow-up to the same
list as the original article.
-- 
Christoph Badura

Now available in print: Lion's Commentary on UNIX 6th Edition, with Source Code
			http://www.peer-to-peer.com/