Subject: Re: pkg_install
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Andrew Reilly <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 10/02/1997 16:22:53
On 1 Oct, Erik E. Fair wrote:
> ANDF is the answer to a question no one here is asking: how do I support
> multiple platforms without handing out my precious, proprietary source code
> to people whose wierd computers I don't have?
I had sort of assumed that this was why people wanted a binary-only
distribution format. Given my own success with the FreeBSD ports
system, I thought that the ease of use argument (below) was no-longer a
starter. You would probably still have to manage a ports
hierarchy for each NetBSD port, but that's still only a few megs/port,
instead of gazillions.
> The goal is to have popular software packages already compiled and
> ready-to-install for each of the platforms that NetBSD supports. This is a
> conveninence for busy people, and makes NetBSD that much more attractive to
> potential users - there's less work to do to set up a system for a wider array
> of uses.
OK, your choice, after all.
If binary installation is somehow easier than source installation, I
still think that NetBSD (with different processors, but identical
system architecture) would be an ideal place to try something like ANDF
"The steady state of disks is full."
-- Ken Thompson