Subject: Re: bin/2932:
To: Jim Wise <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Curt Sampson <email@example.com>
Date: 09/30/1997 17:35:49
On Tue, 30 Sep 1997, Jim Wise wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Sep 1997, Curt Sampson wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 Sep 1997, David Brownlee wrote:
> > > Assuming we had a rebuilt build system, would we still be defining
> > > options in /etc/mk.conf?
> > No.
> This seems wrong to me. /etc/mk.conf is _very_ useful if you have
> several machines sharing /usr/src. How would you do this without it?
You shouldn't be restricted to a single object tree per machine.
It would be replaced with per-object-tree configuration information.
Curt Sampson firstname.lastname@example.org Info at http://www.portal.ca/
Internet Portal Services, Inc. Through infinite myst, software reverberates
Vancouver, BC (604) 257-9400 In code possess'd of invisible folly.