On Tue, 30 Sep 1997, Jim Wise wrote:

> On Tue, 30 Sep 1997, Curt Sampson wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 30 Sep 1997, David Brownlee wrote:
> > 
> > > 	Assuming we had a rebuilt build system, would we still be defining
> > > 	options in /etc/mk.conf?
> > 
> > No.
> 
> This seems wrong to me.  /etc/mk.conf is _very_ useful if you have
> several machines sharing /usr/src.  How would you do this without it?

You shouldn't be restricted to a single object tree per machine.
It would be replaced with per-object-tree configuration information.

cjs

Curt Sampson    cjs@portal.ca	   Info at http://www.portal.ca/
Internet Portal Services, Inc.	   Through infinite myst, software reverberates
Vancouver, BC  (604) 257-9400	   In code possess'd of invisible folly.