William O Ferry writes:
>     I noticed in source-changes that at least some of the lfs code has
> been updated.  Does this by any chance mean that lfs is working, or have
> I been out of the loop that long?  Last I'd heard it wasn't working very
> well (if at all).  Just wondering if that's changed.  I have several
> large HD's that are begging for shorter fsck times...  =)

No, the changes were only for the import of 4.4BSD Lite-2 userland.
Those changes haven't been merged, pending importing of the lite-2
version of /sys/ufs/lfs.

After that's done, there's still no guarantee that lfs will work :-|