In article <Pine.SGI.3.95.970909230353.9444B-100000@bleu.west.spy.net>,
	Dustin Sallings <dustin@spy.net> writes:
> If you use a normal point to point mask (/30) ...

/30 is *not* point 2 point.

> ... then you're using four addresses that meet on the proper boundry.

He has only two address, and there are *not* in a /30 block. Oskar's
proxy arp hack might work but that is what I call bad network design.

> ... but I've never been able to get a Cisco to accept that for a netmask. 

No, need to. Only add a host route to the ethernet.

> 	Anyway, proxy-arp does seem to be the answer.

It's a solution but a *really* *bad* one. I wonder how you can call my
solution bad network design and consider this one fine.

-- 
Matthias Scheler                                http://home.owl.de/~tron/