On Wed, 10 Sep 1997, Markus Illenseer wrote:

# > 	Nothing, when done properly, however, I don't quite get how you're
# > doing it in this setup.  If you use a normal point to point mask (/30) 
# > then you're using four addresses that meet on the proper boundry.  I
# > suppose a /31 is possible, but doesn't make a lot of sense.  PPP
# > interfaces often will use a /32, but I've never been able to get a Cisco
# > to accept that for a netmask. 
#  
#  You read Matthias mail, did you? He only has two IP-Numbers. No Cisco. 

	Right, but he said a Cisco wouldn't have a problem doing it.

--
Taos Mountain TS         My girlfriend asked me which one I like better.
pub  1024/3CAE01D5 1994/11/03 Dustin Sallings <dustin@spy.net>
|    Key fingerprint =  87 02 57 08 02 D0 DA D6  C8 0F 3E 65 51 98 D8 BE 
L_______________________ I hope the answer won't upset her. ____________