Subject: Re: kern/4099: Gather coredumps in one place
To: Ty Sarna <tsarna@endicor.com>
From: Missing - presumed fed. <greywolf@starwolf.starwolf.com>
List: current-users
Date: 09/09/1997 15:36:38
Let _me_ clarify.
Okay, I re-read what you wanted. The unwieldy does not apply to the core-
files themselves, but more to their pathnames, i.e. I could see us
creating files like
core._some_long_convoluted_path_to_xterm.29834.0.1.0.1
[or put the directory name somewhere else]
Personally, one of the things I like about 'ls' is that it columnizes
its output. Get just one of those in a directory and that goes out
the window. I'd just as soon not see this in a pathname.
I presume that the reason you wanted a directory name was to put it
in the core file name format somewhere. This is the discussion that
was being bandied about; if I've missed the point -again-, I certainly
apologise for the misunderstanding.
As far as process root, real root, and mortuary (cwd at time of death) go,
why not just extricate the dev/ino data from the vnode and leave it to the
user?
--*greywolf;
--*greywolf;
--
Sun hardware is great stuff. It's too bad their software has taken
such a downturn.