Subject: Re: goals for 1.3?
To: None <current-users@NetBSD.ORG>
From: Ross Harvey <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 09/04/1997 09:44:01
> Matthieu Herrb <email@example.com> wrote:
> > I'd like amd to be fixed too.
> > It has be mentionned before that since the integration am-tools-6.0a8,
> > amd hangs pretty often (I think it's whenever one server mentionned in
> > the mount table doesn't respond).
> > Should I send-pr this ?
> Yes, please.
am-utils-6.0a10 was not released until the day before yesterday and it
contains a fix for this rather nasty bug. Christos seems to have gone
to the trouble of writing an import script, so I suspect we only need wait
until he drags in the new version. A10 is also said to include a "major
If anyone wants to update their own tree immediately, go to
Here's some amd/netbsd trivia for the list. On the amd-dev list, Ezk writes:
> BTW, I've heard that the NetBSD group merged am-utils' sources
> with their current source tree, to be available in NetBSD 1.3.
> This is the first time I know of that a formal group started
> using am-utils.
Ross Harvey Avalon Computer Systems, Inc. firstname.lastname@example.org
Santa Barbara http://www.teraflop.com