Subject: Re: Port performance comparison?
To: David Maxwell <email@example.com>
From: Leo Bicknell <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 08/28/1997 08:53:04
> NetBSD supports. But the question meant to go a bit further. A couple of
> years ago I would have placed NetBSD Sun3 as a lower performer than other
> 68k platforms because of the somewhat rudimentary SCSI driver that was
> implemented to start the port off. The performance of a whole system
Sounds like you need a table of the following:
Platform Chip Rating NetBSD Rating Native OS Rating
pmax x mips x-y mips x-z mips
m68k a mips a-b mips a-c mips
That way you can compare what the processor should be
able to do vrs what NetBSD is able to get out of it, as well
as how well NetBSD stacks up to the native operating system
for the box.
I would personally find such a table facinating.