Subject: Re: NTP problem
To: Jonathan Stone <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU>
From: Jonathan Stone <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU>
Date: 08/26/1997 18:48:36
On "Tue, 26 Aug 1997 18:17:53 PDT.", I wrote:
>(Perry: any reason not to pull the latest xntp
>5.xx release into the tree?)
Oops. The source in our tree is dated April 1997, and the 3-5.90.1,
3-5.90.2, and 3-5.90.3 releases post-date that, so I assume we haven't
applied the post 3-5.90 changes to the NetBSD tree.
Yet lib/libntp/version.c says '3-5.90 3". Does that means the source
is from build #3 of 3-5.90, or something completely different?
If we don't already hae 5-90.3 in our tree, I think we should get it,
because that's what experts in comp.protocols.time.ntp would advise.
Besides, the u_long -> u_int32 changes in 3-5.90.3 look particularly
worth having. Has anyone actively used xntp on NetBSD/alpha? Did it work?
And, how about incoporating the top-level CHANGELOG or README so that
users have some indication of the provenance of our xntp source base?
(I'd do this myself, but I have paper deadlines.)