Subject: Re: csh build revisited...
To: Andrew Gillham <email@example.com>
From: Curt Sampson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 08/02/1997 14:59:49
On Sat, 2 Aug 1997, Andrew Gillham wrote:
> So whatever "stale" files there were, make didn't
> have a clue on how to remove them.
This is not unusual. This is also why it's better, IMHO, to compile
to a separate object tree; not only is
mv obj.i386 obj.i386.old
rm -rf obj.i386.old &
a lot faster than a `make cleandir', it's also much more reliable.
If you want to take building in a separate object tree to its
sensible conclusion, you can download
untar that over a current source tree, set your BSDOBJDIR and
BSDSRCDIR and the like (as described in src/share/mk/bsd.README),
and build against include files and libraries that are in the object
tree. This way you can build an entire snapshot of a newer version
of NetBSD without risking installing parts of it over your current
Curt Sampson email@example.com Info at http://www.portal.ca/
Internet Portal Services, Inc. `And malt does more than Milton can
Vancouver, BC (604) 257-9400 To justify God's ways to man.'