Subject: Re: are -current kernels ok?
To: Matthias Drochner <email@example.com>
From: Jason Thorpe <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 07/10/1997 11:07:50
On Thu, 10 Jul 1997 19:19:20 +0200 (MET DST)
Matthias Drochner <email@example.com> wrote:
> For a couple of days, all my new kernels panic while
> mounting root (FFS or NFS).
> This happens in the low level task switching, a
> zero PCB pointer in a proc structure is accessed.
> Does anybody have similar problems or did I get an
> inconsistent tree?
This is certainly a machine-dependent error... The hp300, for example,
won't see this... from locore.s:
/* set kernel stack, user SP, and initial pcb */
movl _C_LABEL(proc0paddr),a1 | get proc0 pcb addr
lea a1@(USPACE-4),sp | set kernel stack to end of area
lea _C_LABEL(proc0),a2 | initialize proc0.p_addr so that
movl a1,a2@(P_ADDR) | we don't deref NULL in trap()
..this is right after calling vm_set_page_size(), and before calling
...and at the time that vfs_mountroot() is called, proc0 is the only
process that exists... and proc0.p_addr is initialized by that time
in machine-dependent code, as well! What is the value of proc0paddr
when the system crashes?
Jason R. Thorpe firstname.lastname@example.org
NASA Ames Research Center Home: 408.866.1912
NAS: M/S 258-6 Work: 415.604.0935
Moffett Field, CA 94035 Pager: 415.428.6939