Subject: Re: Pre-new-cgd-license tree?
To: der Mouse <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Jason Thorpe <email@example.com>
Date: 07/06/1997 09:42:46
On Sun, 6 Jul 1997 09:20:47 -0400 (EDT)
der Mouse <mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA> wrote:
> I can only assume that core concluded that this license is acceptable
> to them. This is a Bad Thing for me, because I find that license
> unacceptable, but normally it wouldn't matter in a practical sense
> because all the relevant files are port-specific support for ports I
> don't run.
We, in fact, did not conclude that, and are working on resolving the
Let's not make random assertions; if you have a concern, it's best to get
the facts first, by sending mail to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Jason R. Thorpe email@example.com
NASA Ames Research Center Home: 408.866.1912
NAS: M/S 258-6 Work: 415.604.0935
Moffett Field, CA 94035 Pager: 415.428.6939