current-users: Re: need change in fs mount order

Subject: Re: need change in fs mount order
To: None <current-users@NetBSD.ORG>
From: Christos Zoulas <christos@nyc.deshaw.com>
List: current-users
Date: 06/27/1997 16:53:05

In article <867mfgt7af.fsf@daisy.ut.netlaputa.or.jp> minoura@kw.netlaputa.or.jp (MINOURA Makoto / =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCTCcxOhsoQiAbJEI/PxsoQg==?=) writes:
>
>umapfs (and possibly nullfs) should be mounted after nfs,
>shouldn't it?
>
>mount -a -t nonfs,union,umap,null
>....
>mount -a -t nfs,union,umap,null

Maybe we need a flag that says `mount all local physical partitions'?

christos