Subject: Re: pwdb busy
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Andrew Brown <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 06/24/1997 14:58:39
>> >> maybe chfn needs an alarm to wake it up in case of only the vi process
>> >> being killed?
>> >wait() works just fine.
>> i think you missed the original thrust of the discussion. wait() will
>> not work when chfn has been suspende, and its child (the editor) has
>> been killed. i was suggesting that chfn wake up and notice that the
>> editor has been killed and then release its password database lock.
>How do you propose to wake chfn up if it is stopped? SIGALRM won't be
yes, you're right. that part of my brain was stopped and the alarm
when i typed stupid things didn't wake it up. :)
see my previous followup...
|-----< "CODE WARRIOR" >-----|
email@example.com (TheMan) * "ah! i see you have the internet
firstname.lastname@example.org that goes *ping*!"
email@example.com * "information is power -- share the wealth."