Subject: Re: pwdb busy
To: Andrew Brown <email@example.com>
From: Perry E. Metzger <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 06/24/1997 14:49:34
Andrew Brown writes:
> >> maybe chfn needs an alarm to wake it up in case of only the vi process
> >> being killed?
> >wait() works just fine.
> i think you missed the original thrust of the discussion. wait() will
> not work when chfn has been suspende, and its child (the editor) has
> been killed. i was suggesting that chfn wake up and notice that the
> editor has been killed and then release its password database lock.
How do you propose to wake chfn up if it is stopped? SIGALRM won't be