Subject: Re: copyright questions
To: Charles M. Hannum <mycroft@mit.edu>
From: Andrew Gillham <gillhaa@ghost.whirlpool.com>
List: current-users
Date: 06/13/1997 18:00:06
Charles M. Hannum writes:
>
> But I digress a bit.
>
> The cases you're talking about are a little different, because the
> scope of the license terms is different. E.g., if I'm publishing a
> CD-ROM, it's unlikely that the cover is going to mention a specific
> Ethernet driver, but it's very likely that it will mention that NetBSD
> runs on Alphas. This is advertising material. Given the license
> terms, even the original Berkeley license terms, this requires me to
> include the attribution for Chris, but *not* for you, somewhere on the
> cover. Indeed, it's not clear that any of the vendors of NetBSD,
I appreciate your clarification Charles, but I believe your interpretation
is incorrect. The text of the license is:
* 2. The following Acknowledgment must be used in communications
* involving the Software as described below:
*
* This product includes software developed by
* Christopher G. Demetriou for the NetBSD Project.
*
* The Acknowledgment must be conspicuously and completely displayed
* whenever the Software, or any software, products or systems containing
* the Software, are mentioned in advertising, marketing, informational
* or publicity materials of any kind, whether in print, electronic or
* other media (except for information provided to support use of
* products containing the Software by existing users or customers).
*
The problem is that this requires The Acknowledgment to be displayed
whenever "..., or any software, products or systems containing the
Software, are mentioned..." This means that if I have a product
based on NetBSD, which includes the alpha port, or any code with
Chris' new copyright, merely mentioning *my* product means I have
to have Chris' Acknowledgment displayed. It is not necessary *at all*
to mention any features covered by Chris' copyright to be required
to attribute. So.. with the CDROM example, I would be required to
print The Acknowledgment regardless of whether I mentioned it ran
on the Alpha. Therefore, if I submitted an ethernet driver with the
same license, I would be required to attribute that as well, even
though I don't mention it on the cover. I can't believe that the
attributions for very many developers would fit on the front/back of
a CDROM.
Perhaps I am misinterpreting the "...or any software, products or
systems containing..." line, but I don't see how it can be interpreted
differently.
-Andrew
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Andrew Gillham | This space left blank
gillham@whirlpool.com | inadvertently.
I speak for myself, not for my employer. | Contact the publisher.